1.)My own wonderful academy
2.)Have my own restaurant
3.)To be a professional technology programmer
4.)Build my own company
I hope I could accomplish this things!
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
What I want to be in my future.
When I will grow up my ambition is to be a successful person. Who can achieve more things. Maybe someday I could be/ have:
1.)My own wonderful academy
2.)Have my own restaurant
3.)To be a professional technology programmer
4.)Build my own company
I hope I could accomplish this things!
1.)My own wonderful academy
2.)Have my own restaurant
3.)To be a professional technology programmer
4.)Build my own company
I hope I could accomplish this things!
My Top 4 Idols
Proud to Present My Idols
1. Lance Bleza De Ocampo
He is a twitter sensation. I Idol him because he is so friendly, and have the characteristics of a gentleman. I love him sooooooooooooooo! much!
2. Kimpoy Feliciano
He is a tumblr sensation. As a social networking addict I Idol him because of his tumblr post and more.
3. Jamich
They are my third Idol. This couples are youtube sensation. You know why I love them? Because they are so sweet and their relationship is so long already it is more than a year. And I also love their videos mostly their video graphics. I really love it!
4. Vice Ganda
I Idol him because he's jokes are so funny! There has no show, drama and movie of him is not funny, all of them are funny.
1. Lance Bleza De Ocampo
He is a twitter sensation. I Idol him because he is so friendly, and have the characteristics of a gentleman. I love him sooooooooooooooo! much!
2. Kimpoy Feliciano
He is a tumblr sensation. As a social networking addict I Idol him because of his tumblr post and more.
3. Jamich
They are my third Idol. This couples are youtube sensation. You know why I love them? Because they are so sweet and their relationship is so long already it is more than a year. And I also love their videos mostly their video graphics. I really love it!
4. Vice Ganda
I Idol him because he's jokes are so funny! There has no show, drama and movie of him is not funny, all of them are funny.
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
I'm Proud of my Family
My Family
Family is the most important thing of my life. You know why? Because of them I'm still alive and healthy. They give me the strength to do things that I can't. Because of them I can study in a well private school. All their sacrifice is for us so we can eat 3 times a day, give what we want and needs, have a proper clothes, live in a small home, and many more.
Description about my Family:
My Father
The name of my father is Avelino C. Diocampo. He lives at Puertobello, Camotes Island, Cebu. My father's birthday is on February 19, 1963. His to old already but even he is so old I still love him because my love for him will never change.
My Mother
The name of my mother is Evangeline G. Diocampo. When she is still young her family name is Gutual. She lives at Sindangan Province, Zamboanga del Norte. The language of my mother and father is thesame (Bisaya). The birth of my mother is on April 5, 1965. Even though she is scold us almost everyday I still love her even she do that on me because I know she do that for a cause that she can grow up me as a good girl.
My Brother
The name of my brother is Paolo Jose G. Diocampo. He is still studying at Caldwell Adventist Academy as a Grade 4 pupil. He's birthday is on February 22. 2002. My brother is so naughty but still I love him very much.
Family – The Basic Social Unit
Family is the basic social unit. Family represents people living
together by ties of marriage, blood or adaptation, thus representing a
single household. According to sociology, the family has the primary
function of reproducing society; biologically, socially, or both. There
are various structures of a family based on the relationship shared
between the parent and the children. The different types of family are
patrifocal, where the family consists of a father and his child;
matrifocal, where the family consists of a mother and her child.
Consanguineal family is one which consists of the mother, the child and
other people, mainly belonging to the family of the mother. The conjugal
family consists of one or more mothers and their children, with other
people and one or more spouses.
The parent-child relationship varies due to different cultures. One of the prominent forms is the nuclear family. It consists of the marital pair living with their offspring separately. The joint family is an extension of the nuclear family. Joint family occurs when children of one sex live at their parents’ house. In a joint family, the children bring along their spouse to live with them at their parents’ house after marriage. A joint family usually consists of an older man and his wife, his sons and unmarried daughters, his sons’ wives and children. Members of a joint family share all the task of trade, food gathering and preparation and child rearing.
Children who share one parent but not another are called “half-brothers” or “half-sisters”. Children who do not share parents, but whose parents are married, are called “step-brothers” or “step-sisters”. Similarly, if a person is married to the parent of a child, but is not the parent of the child themselves; they are called “stepfather” or “stepmother”.
A complex family involves more than two adults. It refers to any extended family or to polygamy of any type. A joint family is also known as a complex family. The parents and their children in a joint family live together under a single roof. In a joint family setup, the womenfolk are often housewives and cook for the entire family. The patriarch of the family is usually the oldest male member, who lays down the rules of the family. This kind of setup is fast eroding in many parts of the world. Almost all the urban families are switching over to the nuclear family society.
The parent-child relationship varies due to different cultures. One of the prominent forms is the nuclear family. It consists of the marital pair living with their offspring separately. The joint family is an extension of the nuclear family. Joint family occurs when children of one sex live at their parents’ house. In a joint family, the children bring along their spouse to live with them at their parents’ house after marriage. A joint family usually consists of an older man and his wife, his sons and unmarried daughters, his sons’ wives and children. Members of a joint family share all the task of trade, food gathering and preparation and child rearing.
Children who share one parent but not another are called “half-brothers” or “half-sisters”. Children who do not share parents, but whose parents are married, are called “step-brothers” or “step-sisters”. Similarly, if a person is married to the parent of a child, but is not the parent of the child themselves; they are called “stepfather” or “stepmother”.
A complex family involves more than two adults. It refers to any extended family or to polygamy of any type. A joint family is also known as a complex family. The parents and their children in a joint family live together under a single roof. In a joint family setup, the womenfolk are often housewives and cook for the entire family. The patriarch of the family is usually the oldest male member, who lays down the rules of the family. This kind of setup is fast eroding in many parts of the world. Almost all the urban families are switching over to the nuclear family society.
Family vs. Culture
The family is the foundation of culture. This is not a bromide of the
Christian right, but plain fact, as every anthropologist will tell
you. Families associate with groups of families, forming networks of
social interdependence as families make a living, socialize children,
and protect themselves. The family and the culture are supposed to
work hand-in-hand.
But today, in the twenty-first century West, we are struggling through a cultural dysfunction of almost unparalleled magnitude. The culture and the family are now in conflict, to the detriment of both.
Cultural artifacts are set against the family. According to anthropologists, the artifacts of a culture — its art, stories, music, and other creations — serve to communicate and to reinforce that culture’s values. By these means, the elders teach the children the ways of the culture. Eventually, the young people learn what they need to know and are initiated into adulthood, whereupon they can start families of their own.
But today, families are put in the strange position of having to protect their children from their own culture.
Our culture’s art, stories, music, and other creations tend to undermine what parents are trying to teach their children, rather than reinforce them. Our culture’s artifacts — television, movies, and video games — often glamorize immorality. The world they project often has nothing to do with family, being mostly about the adventures of single people. When the entertainment media does deign to show families, they are often presented in a negative light (with husbands and wives yelling at each other and yearning to be single; with buffoon fathers and smothering mothers; with misunderstood children who are wiser than their parents).
And, in the oddest anthropological phenomenon of all, our cultural artifacts are shaped not by adults but by children. Teenagers set our cultural fashions. In every other culture, elders determine the fashions, make the music, and tell the stories. With us, adolescent children make the culture.
Of course, children cannot afford recording studios or Hollywood sound stages. Adults still manufacture and sell the artifacts. But they gear television and movies to the taste of adolescents, with little effort to form them into adults. And our popular music is entirely the province of teenagers, who are the performers and trend-setters. The result is that our adult culture is infantilized. Adults try to be like children, instead of vice versa, as is the case in normal cultures. All of this is, of course, pathetic, ridiculous, and embarrassing to actual children.
Sex is set against the family. God designed sex in order to create families. A man and a woman are drawn to each other, and they marry. By means of their sexual union, they engender children. Sex is supposed to be a family value.
But today, our culture presents sex completely out of the context of the family. Sex is not reserved for marriage. Most of the many portrayals of sex in our cultural artifacts are specifically outside marriage.
And from those portrayals, one would never dream that sex exists to engender children. In practice, “getting pregnant” is an unfortunate side effect of sexual pleasure, to be medicated against. If the woman wants the child, of course, that is fine, but if not — since in our culture, the choice of the will determines everything — the child is killed.
When sex is disassociated from marriage and from having children — from the family — the pleasure is all that remains. And it becomes difficult for many people to see what is wrong with whatever gives a person sexual pleasure. If sex is disconnected with marriage and having children, why not have sex with someone you are not married to? Or with someone of your own gender? Or with yourself?
Work is set against the family. The Reformers spoke of the “three estates,” the three institutions God established: the family, the church, and the state. We, in turn, have callings — or vocations — in each of these realms, where we are to love and serve our different neighbors and live out our Christian faith.
When we think of “vocation” today, we often immediately think of the particular work we do. But the word “economics” originally referred to “the management of a household.” For the Reformers, the various callings that constitute economic activity fell under the estate of the family.
In our work, we make a living for ourselves and our families. Our vocations are not a matter of our own self-fulfillment or self-aggrandizement, but for the sake of our neighbors: the customers we serve and the family-members we are supporting.
But today, work is thought of as being about the self. Our work isolates us rather than brings us into service to our culture and especially to our families. Thus, we often neglect our families in favor of our work. When fathers are so busy at work — or commuting back and forth — that they spend less than five minutes a day with their children, as is common today, their callings are seriously out of whack.
Broken marriages, unparented children, pornography, abortion, and most of our other “culture war” issues are family problems. Building strong families is the key to putting the culture back together.
http://nowspeakenglish.com/?tag=what-is-family
But today, in the twenty-first century West, we are struggling through a cultural dysfunction of almost unparalleled magnitude. The culture and the family are now in conflict, to the detriment of both.
Cultural artifacts are set against the family. According to anthropologists, the artifacts of a culture — its art, stories, music, and other creations — serve to communicate and to reinforce that culture’s values. By these means, the elders teach the children the ways of the culture. Eventually, the young people learn what they need to know and are initiated into adulthood, whereupon they can start families of their own.
But today, families are put in the strange position of having to protect their children from their own culture.
Our culture’s art, stories, music, and other creations tend to undermine what parents are trying to teach their children, rather than reinforce them. Our culture’s artifacts — television, movies, and video games — often glamorize immorality. The world they project often has nothing to do with family, being mostly about the adventures of single people. When the entertainment media does deign to show families, they are often presented in a negative light (with husbands and wives yelling at each other and yearning to be single; with buffoon fathers and smothering mothers; with misunderstood children who are wiser than their parents).
And, in the oddest anthropological phenomenon of all, our cultural artifacts are shaped not by adults but by children. Teenagers set our cultural fashions. In every other culture, elders determine the fashions, make the music, and tell the stories. With us, adolescent children make the culture.
Of course, children cannot afford recording studios or Hollywood sound stages. Adults still manufacture and sell the artifacts. But they gear television and movies to the taste of adolescents, with little effort to form them into adults. And our popular music is entirely the province of teenagers, who are the performers and trend-setters. The result is that our adult culture is infantilized. Adults try to be like children, instead of vice versa, as is the case in normal cultures. All of this is, of course, pathetic, ridiculous, and embarrassing to actual children.
Sex is set against the family. God designed sex in order to create families. A man and a woman are drawn to each other, and they marry. By means of their sexual union, they engender children. Sex is supposed to be a family value.
But today, our culture presents sex completely out of the context of the family. Sex is not reserved for marriage. Most of the many portrayals of sex in our cultural artifacts are specifically outside marriage.
And from those portrayals, one would never dream that sex exists to engender children. In practice, “getting pregnant” is an unfortunate side effect of sexual pleasure, to be medicated against. If the woman wants the child, of course, that is fine, but if not — since in our culture, the choice of the will determines everything — the child is killed.
When sex is disassociated from marriage and from having children — from the family — the pleasure is all that remains. And it becomes difficult for many people to see what is wrong with whatever gives a person sexual pleasure. If sex is disconnected with marriage and having children, why not have sex with someone you are not married to? Or with someone of your own gender? Or with yourself?
Work is set against the family. The Reformers spoke of the “three estates,” the three institutions God established: the family, the church, and the state. We, in turn, have callings — or vocations — in each of these realms, where we are to love and serve our different neighbors and live out our Christian faith.
When we think of “vocation” today, we often immediately think of the particular work we do. But the word “economics” originally referred to “the management of a household.” For the Reformers, the various callings that constitute economic activity fell under the estate of the family.
In our work, we make a living for ourselves and our families. Our vocations are not a matter of our own self-fulfillment or self-aggrandizement, but for the sake of our neighbors: the customers we serve and the family-members we are supporting.
But today, work is thought of as being about the self. Our work isolates us rather than brings us into service to our culture and especially to our families. Thus, we often neglect our families in favor of our work. When fathers are so busy at work — or commuting back and forth — that they spend less than five minutes a day with their children, as is common today, their callings are seriously out of whack.
Broken marriages, unparented children, pornography, abortion, and most of our other “culture war” issues are family problems. Building strong families is the key to putting the culture back together.
http://nowspeakenglish.com/?tag=what-is-family
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)